Our Divided Political Heart.

This book has a promising, if not a bit academic introduction – pointing to the current drift from pragmatism and mixed center as the philosophical basis of the United States, to a one-note mentality centered around a deceptive concept of individualism. A drift from “yes, both” to “this only”.

E. J. Dionne makes the case:

At the heart of this book is a view that American history is defined by an irrepressible and ongoing tension between two core values: our love of individualism and our reverence for community.

(..) We are not very skilled at balance anymore. That is why we have lost our gift for reasoning together.

(..) The United States rose to global preeminence because in accepting our commitments to both individualism and community, we were able to see democratic government as a constructive force in our national life and to use it in creative ways.

(..) We must recover our respect for balance and remember its central role in our history. We are a nation of individualists who care passionately about community.

To the no compromise crowd:

This extreme individualism sees the “common good” not as a worthy objective but as a manipulative slogan disguising a lust for power by government bureaucrats and the ideological ambitions of left-wing utopians. This view has transformed both American conservatism and the Republican Party.

And to protective government, something that failed:

In our history, government has far more frequently been a liberating force that operated on behalf of the many. This has been true not just since the New Deal but also from the beginning of our national experiment.

(..) The intervention of democratic government has often been necessary to protect individuals from concentrated private power. It is government’s failure to live up to this duty that gave rise to the anti–Wall Street protests.

The introduction is beautifully written, very thoughtful and detailed, but dancing a little bit around WHY things have changed like this.

But a good read so far.

Cantor on diversity, tolerance and religion.

The rapid push back on Bachmann from McCain, Rollins, Boehner and others this week – which might’ve been left unopposed for a long time in 2010/11 – might suggest that some promising things are slowly beginning to happen on the right. A stronger moderate conservative bloc is good for everybody.

Tea Party Troop Leader going all soft and diverse.

And even if all of this is just talk and hot air – it’s a clear change of tone from Eric Cantor:

“I think an even bigger issue than that, from a cultural standpoint, is the acceptance of diversity. And the acceptance of diversity of opinion,” Cantor said, explaining that while he may have is own personal opinions on morality or religion, “at some point we’re all here as Americans and we all have to be appreciative of other people’s views.”

(..) “And it’s that tolerance, I think that that tolerance is something that enables people to be passionate about their positions. And if you’re for gay marriage, this country allows you to express your views. Some states support it and allow it, and others don’t. But its ok to have that difference of opinion in that,” he said.

(..) “I’ve always said we need to be a party of inclusion not exclusion,” Cantor said. “We need to be promoting tolerance and, you know, as someone who is a religious minority, I sort of grew up with having that mindset, knowing full well that I am in a very distinct way from a religious background, separate and apart from the mainstream of this country.”

But we’ll see.

It’s the Middle Class, Stupid!

This latest book by James Carville and Stan Greenberg was a little bit of a disappointment, mostly because of a messy style – but also because there was very little news or fresh analysis on politics or economics. But it is important stuff.

From the opening:

WE ARE WRITING THIS BOOK BECAUSE WE FAILED AND THAT’S NOT GOOD ENOUGH

There’s no other way to put it. We failed. It is as simple as that. Both of us have spent our lives focused on what’s happening with working people and seeing them get a fair shake for a hard day’s work—seeing them get the chance to move up the ladder and be honored. We put the middle class at the center of the world, because you can’t have an America without a middle class.

Well, we failed, and we have got to do better, and that’s why we are writing this book.

And this chart sums up the basis for the book:

Income distribution – something changed in the late 1970′s.

More here.

Conservatives against the GOP.

Will

Speaking out.

Not sure how many listen to George Will anymore, but, he’s starting to sound like a man without a country.

On the slut meme:

Mr. Boehner comes out and says, Rush’s language was inappropriate. Using a salad fork for your entree, that’s inappropriate. Not this stuff. I mean, and Rick Santorum says well, what he says was absurd, but an entertainer is allowed to be absurd. No. It is the responsibility of conservatives to police the right in its excesses, just as the liberals unfailingly fail to police the excesses in their own side. And it was depressing, because what it indicates is that the Republican leaders are afraid of Rush Limbaugh. They want to bomb Iran, but they’re afraid of Rush Limbaugh.”

There you go.

Full story.

CPAC and Culture Wars.

Cpac12

New focus.

Imagine the flurry before the CPAC – about whether or not to switch the main fleet of attacks towards the Culture Wars, or to keep them steady at the Economy. A few months of rising private sector job growth and falling unemployment numbers (even b/o discouraged workers) might point towards a real recovery, but it could also quickly collapse this summer or fall.

And besides the high risk of switching to a less effective theme in the election year, it also undercuts the front-runner Romney on both his strengths and weaknesses – creating more chaos and possibly handing the nomination to a fringe candidate with heaps of unelectables associated with him.

But,

this is also plain fairness playing out – if the economy really improves and the country is on the mend, the President is doing a good job – and probably deserves a second term.