Things are piling up here.. all sides attacking the WH’s inability to handle the debt crises – as well as some slamming the current non-intervention philosophy in foreign affairs.
The coverstory of Newsweek this week hammers on the lack of a Grand Strategy in the Middle East, and the problems with a multi-faceted and contradictory management of diplomatic relations.
Discussing Egypt, revolutions and US (non) strategy in Foreign Policy.
Ferguson is very outspoken here – calling Clinton and Gates second rate strategists – as well as pointing out some historical facts about sudden revolutions and unpredictable consequences in the Greater Middle East.
From the article:
Last week, for the second time in his presidency, Barack Obama heard those footsteps, jumped up to grasp a historic opportunity … and missed it completely.
The result has been a foreign-policy debacle. The president has alienated everybody: not only Mubarak’s cronies in the military, but also the youthful crowds in the streets of Cairo. Whoever ultimately wins, Obama loses. And the alienation doesn’t end there. America’s two closest friends in the region—Israel and Saudi Arabia—are both disgusted. The Saudis, who dread all manifestations of revolution, are appalled at Washington’s failure to resolutely prop up Mubarak. The Israelis, meanwhile, are dismayed by the administration’s apparent cluelessness.
This failure was not the result of bad luck. It was the predictable consequence of the Obama administration’s lack of any kind of coherent grand strategy, a deficit about which more than a few veterans of U.S. foreign policy making have long worried. The president himself is not wholly to blame. Although cosmopolitan by both birth and upbringing, Obama was an unusually parochial politician prior to his election, judging by his scant public pronouncements on foreign-policy issues.
Article here,
clip here.
The health care President cuts a deal on scrapping nukes.